[Exceptional C++ Style] Item 16 - (Mostly) Private

David Sykes d.sykes at pindar.com
Thu Dec 16 04:27:48 EST 2004


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Grenyer [mailto:paul at paulgrenyer.co.uk]

> Again in this item there are ways of perverting the language 
> I had never 
> considered before......
> 

Which ways did you mean? The partial specialisation perversion was covered
in the previous item, and I wouldn't have considered 'leaking' a function a
perversion, rather a design choice. A function that has access to something
should be able to choose who they pass this on to, isn't this how interfaces
work?


David Sykes
[ *** LongSig auto truncated *** ]

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
---



More information about the Effective-cpp mailing list